| |
|
What
Happened to the Wangunks?
(Part 2)
by Doris Sherrow, December 1999
The Wangunk
Indians and early settlers of Portland seem to have gotten along quite
well. James Stanclift hired a brave named Sacient to deliver
gravestones. The tribe welcomed Giles Hall, Job Bates, Richard Strickland,
and others onto their land as fellow farmers and hunters. Cuschoy
helped two local officials lay out part of High Street. So what happened
to induce the Wangunk to leave Portland?
From all appearances, there were two main
factors. First, younger Wangunks began to move out of the area, to places
where other tribes were gathering, as the English presence increased in
the land. Second, various officials seem to have begun a subtle pressure
on the Indians to leave the area, at least in part to further the developmentby
the Englishof their towns.
The first official foray into the reservation
came from the Congregational Church, when they bought land for their new
minister, Moses Bartlett, in 1731. They chose 40 acres of the Wangunk
reservation bounded by what are now Bartlett, High, and William streets.
It seems curious that no English settler had land to sell to the new minister,
that 40 acres of Wangunk land had to be taken.
Nor did Bartlett build his house on the
south side of the lot, near the church. He built on the north side, on
Bartlett Street opposite Prospect, facing part of the reservation.
In the 1740s, the church decided it had
outgrown its building. The siting of the meeting house was traditionally
a controversial issue in early towns: both civil and ecclesiastical meetings
were held there, and the men who lived closer would have more power in
the towns affairs. Portland seems to have had an ongoing controversy
between settlers in what is now Middle Haddam and those along Main Street
and up the Glastonbury Turnpike.
The standard solution to a siting-the-meeting-house
dispute was to have a committee from the General Assembly, ostensibly
disinterested parties, to determine a fair location. The committee which
came to Portland in the late 1740s found the fairest location to be squarely
in the middle of the Wangunk reservation, on what is now the northeast
corner of Bartlett and Prospect streets, opposite Rev. Bartletts
house.
Why there? It was hardly the geographical
center between Middle Haddam and Main Street. Could the General Assembly
have been pursuing a policy of easing the Indians off land which they
felt could be more productively occupied by English settlers? A couple
years later, they voted to reserve 500 pounds for use by any Indians who
would migrate to Stockbridge, Massachusetts, where many had gathered.
Despite whatever pressure might have been
rising, the Wangunk retained their mettle. The church hoped to buy three
acres. The buyers were instructed to get three acres if the price was
15 pounds per acre, otherwise to buy one acre. The Wangunk held out for
18 pounds, and the settlers bought a single acre.
A few short months later, James Sasepequen
sold a fellow tribesman one acre, similar in every respect to the
church acre, for 15 pounds: was this coincidence or was he sending a message
to the increasingly avaricious settlers?
In 1756 the settlers petitioned the General
Assembly for permission to buy the rest of the Wangunks land. These
are the reasons they gave: the spot for the meeting house had been picked
by the General Assembly (which was true) "we was obliged to
build there," they wailedand now no inhabitants could settle
nearby because it was Indian land.
Furthermore, it would be good land for tilling,
"yet it bares no charge to Society, Town, or Colony, therefore great
damage to us all but especially to us who want to have our charge eased."
In other words, it was generating no tax money, and the townsmen wanted
it to generate tax money so that their own taxes could be lowered.
The English said further that the "Indian
owners are dispersedfew live on said land; those that do
are all together unable to support themselves & are daley supported
by some of our inhabitants." Cuschoy, the sachem, was allegedly lame
and unable to work. Cuschoy, for his part, explained that there were no
more than 12 or 13 descendants besides himself, and that they were dispersed
and would be difficult to locate.
A committee from the General Assembly came
to Portland to investigate. They found that no Indians were being "daley
supported" by any English, a fact which town poor records from the
period confirm. They did, however, vote to allow the settlers to buy the
Wangunk land in 1765. The 12 to 13 descendants that Cuschoy had claimed
would be hard to locate mushroomed into approximately 30, who somehow
found their way back to Middletown to sign the deed for the property.
From these deeds, it appears as if the Wangunk
community had been slowly migrating away, to Farmington, to Stockbridge,
and west. The signatures on the deeds suggest that the young people had
left the areathere were more couples and minors from outlying areasleaving
the old people, like Cuschoy and his wife, in Portland. Compare this to
20th-century city dynamics, where families matured in the city in the
early 20th century, then moved to the suburbs, leaving their elderly parents
behind in the old neighborhood.
Top
|
|